Report to Gipping Valley February 2013

Budgets: The County budget was passed on 14th Feb. 

The headline announcement was a promise to freeze council tax for four years.  In a time of austerity we don’t want demands on our income to rise but this looks like a pre-election give away.  Who will suffer and will other changes make it possible?

In summary, estimates of cost increases on a £511m net budget are Inflation £7.7m, Demand and Demography £12.4m and “other Changes” £21.3m lifting the total to £552.4m.  

Government grants and council taxes total £527.4m, so the county must save £24.9m of which £20.1m is “saving” of estimated increases.

Headline “savings” include: improve efficiency and remove unnecessary processes £9.7m, target resources in children’s services £2.5m, adult care in depth review £7m.

Obviously the efficiency improvements and removal of unnecessary processes are long overdue.  My biggest concerns are the care review and targeting in children’s services.  These can be disguised cuts that increase the problems suffered by vulnerable people.

I proposed a small addition to the budget to provide some focused immediate action to help schools improve pupil progress and attainment.  After eight years the administration has moved us from the top third to third from bottom in national league tables.  It was rejected and Suffolk children must wait for action.

GCSE rankings: Suffolk has now dropped to 141 out of 152 authorities for GCSE results.  The County Council claims that this is down to exams boards changing grade boundaries, but it simply isn’t good enough.  

It is extremely concerning how low Suffolk is ranked nationally for education, and this is something which clearly has not been addressed by the administration.

Road Safety: The first phase of improvements to road markings at the Pound Lane accident spot are now in place but the police are still resisting a reduction in the speed limit.   Improved centre markings and movement of the 50mph markers towards Bramford are yet to come. 

You will have seen work progressing on Bramford Road by the incinerator, as the road signs for the 40mph limit and the urban clearway are put in place.  This should give the police additional tools to control the lorry parking that is making life difficult.

Councillors Guy McGregor and Lisa Chambers who are responsible for highways and waste will meet with local businesses to try to find a cooperative solution to the problems that protects both our environment and jobs.

District Council: Councillors are still defining “priorities” for the future.  However, a balanced budget with a zero council tax rise will be possible that adds slightly to reserves.  There will be no new dramatic cuts but there are still redundancies to come as the transformation programme is completed.

This year there will be changes in council tax rebates and housing benefits, reductions for excess rooms and movement towards a single payment instead of a range of benefits. 

The effect of the caps involved in these will make finance even more challenging for many families.  The impact on local councils will not be trivial as small amounts of council tax will be difficult and expensive to collect.

Highways

The final agreement to outsource highways services to Balfour Beatty  in a £200m contract lasting five years was made at cabinet.   The company was to be responsible for the design and implementation of highways maintenance and improvement works, winter gritting, street lighting, traffic signals and bridge work throughout the county.  However they have pulled out at the last minute for reasons that are far from clear but which I believe relate to additional risk associated with the transfer of staff.
 
We had been assured that some £2 million would be saved per year and that the level of service would be maintained.  This must now be at risk although the County view is that they are essentially returning to an earlier stage in the negotiations and the overall projectr is not compromised.

It is important that whatever changes occur you continue to enjoy high standards of routine maintenance, a rapid response to problems and winter gritting that keeps the county moving. When councilors need to intervene we will still hope to get rapid action.

District Council Budget

The initial analysis by officers indicates that a balanced budget will be possible adding slightly to reserves without moving from the position defined during the current year.  Savings from redundancies already determined but not yet all implemented should be sufficient.

There are to be major changes this year in council tax rebates and housing benefits, reductions for excess rooms and teh Government are moving towards a single payment instead of a range of benefits.  The effect of the caps involved in these will remove some significant anomalies but also make finance even more challenging for many families.  The impact on local councils will not be trivial.  Small amounts of council tax will be difficult and expensive to collect from people without money, for instance.

County Council Budget

We now all know the content of the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement in outline and the details of the settlement for the County and District Councils were released the 19th of December.  The financial officer’s analysis of the impact on Suffolk has been completed and the budget proposals will be considered at Cabinet tomorrow then at full council.

In summary, Estimates of cost increases on a £511M net budget are Inflation £7.7M, Demand and Demography £12.4M and “other Changes” £-4.1M.  Specific grants are £17M against £18.7 last year so we lose another £1.7M there.  That makes £17.7M in total.  There is also a new responsibility for public health which will cost £25.6M and is covered by a £25.6M grant.

Headline “savings” are Improve efficiency and remove unnecessary processes £9.7M, reduce management costs £0.5M rationalise office accommodation £1.3M, target resources in children’s services £2.5M, adult care in depth review £7M, re-let the highway contract £2M, reduce costs of waste services £0.8M and misc £1.1M for a total of £24.9M

Government formula grant £235.4M and Council Tax were £256.9M last year (adjusted for changes that have been made) Total £492M and for this year Revenue Support Grant £134.9M, Business Rates £90.5M (including top up and Council Tax £258.6 a total of £485.6M, £6.4M less.

Obviously the efficiency improvements and accommodation moves are long overdue but the care review and targeting in children’s services has the potential to increase the problems suffered by vulnerable people.

Road Safety

Road Safety is always an issue but my “Quality of Life” road improvement budget is very limited.  However this year we have surfaced Cock Lane and placed “no parking” markings to make it easier to exit the St John’s Ambulance premises in Bramford.  We will be installing “Halo” rings round the heads of the Belisha Beacons at the “Co-Op” zebra crossing in Claydon to make it more visible.

The most important work will be at Pound Lane on the B1113 where there have been several serious accidents. I hope to see road markings to make the location of the junction more obvious, the speed limit reduced to 40mph and the bus stops moved away from the junction.  Until that happens, I have asked the police, via the Chief Constable, to enforce the present limit.

If you would like to see the details click on  Pound Lane proposals to download the plan

My “Locality Budget”

Each year County Councillors have a “Locality Budget” to use to support local organisations.  The best support is to help them gain much larger funds from the District Council, the lottery or landfill tax and many groups in Gipping Valley do that very well. 

So far, this year I have helped: Barham Green residents, St Peters 60+ club, Crucial Crew, Bramford Loraine Victory Hall, Claydon Primary, Bramford Playing Field, 4ever young, cycle speedway and Claydon & Barham Community Centre.

The Victory Hall committee and the Playing Field committee used the money, together with funds from the parish to leavel in substantial grants from the SITA trust.  Just what we need!

Applications are in hand for Gt Blakenham Village Hall, Barham & Claydon Football Club, Bramford Football Club, Claydon Parish for Street Light improvements and Cherryfields. 

I hope you find that a good selection.  If not let me know by filling in a comment.

Integration at Mid Suffolk District Council

At Mid Suffolk District Council , we are integrating the Mid Suffolk and Babergh teams, reducing senior management and we hope “empowering” middle management and the front line people.  This is all to reduce costs but also to improve the service you get.

All councillors and senior officers are involved in “Community Engagement” asking you what the council does well and what it could do better.  What services you value and which you would be happy to go without.  So far Great Blakenham and Little Blakenham Parishes have given their views and Branford is on the list but we intend to get to Cherryfields, the WI and Businesses soon.

I am involved with the transformation of the planning service to make it more responsive and more efficient.  The Councillor team believe you want professional high quality decisions made quickly that encourage development but preserve the qualities of Suffolk that make it such a good place to live.  We also want the planning service to be a good place to work.

If we are wrong please let me know.

Cock Alley to Gippingstone Road

County Highways are at long last constructing a footway to link Cock Alley to Gippingstone Road to allow parents to use the path to get to the school without getting muddy. The work will start on the 23rd July and take approximately a week. 

I was asked for this by the team that look at safe travel to school some years ago but it has been an uphill struggle to get the land transferred from Mid Suffolk District Council.

The county say that noise and dust will be kept to a minimum and the work should not affect vehicles and pedestrian access. 

The footway will be constructed along the right side of the left hedge above and will be two metres wide leading to the existing footway  

 If you have any specific requirements, such as disability access, or deliveries planned for this date, please contact the contractor, Suffolk Highways Contracting 01473 588640.

If you have any queries about these works, contact (0845 606 6171) and ask to speak to Aaron Gordon

National Grid latest route proposals for Bramford to Twinsted

Today Natrional Grid announced their latest position on the Bramford to Twinsted Tee connection that will be needed to take power from the North Sea windfarm East Anglia One and Sizewell C (if it is ever built) to London.

Local groups, the Libdems, the MP, County Council and District Councils have all  been fighting to get National Grid to use modern technology to underground this connection that will otherwise blight our lives, damage our tourist industry and be out of date before it comes into use.

Have they adapted their plans?  Well, two short sections through the Dedham Vale AONB and the Stour Valley will be underground but the residents closer to Bramford, particularly in Hintlesham, are still cursed with a double 400kv pylon line.

National Grid, this is just not good enough.  Minimising cost at the expense of so many is not acceptable.  Why not go for undergroiund DC connections like the windfarm companies are proposing?  There is time to re-think,  Sizewell  C will only be constructed if the French Government decide it is good business and the final three parts of East Anglia One are some time away.  The re-vamped existing line which will carry some 6,200 Mega watts will do till then.

Latest National Grid Data is at http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/MajorProjects/BramfordTwinstead/Documents/index.htm

Scrutiny on 1st May: Suffolk Circle and Demand Responsive Transport

On the 1st May we shall be looking at the Suffolk Circle (a membership scheme for the elderly to provide help through a token system), and Demand Responsive Transport.  We will be assessing how successful each service is, and make recommendations about how the Council should proceed.

Our interest in demand responsive transport revolves around the great emphasis that is being placed on this as a solution to the problem of providing adequate public transport in rural areas.

In order to get a good picture of how these service are actually functioning we have decided to launch a brief consultation.  We want to know what you think works and what needs to be improved.  You can respond by heading to the link below and filling in the short survey, by post, or e-mail.  The deadline is the 20th of April.   http://www.surveymonkey.com/demandresponsive

Gipping Valley News from John Field