All posts by johnfield

SCC Liberal Democrat Views on SCC 2015-16 Budget

This year we have chosen not to attempt a detailed amendment to the budget but to comment on matters of principal at a strategic level on those service areas we consider most important.

The Liberal Democrat group is fully aware of the overall financial situation and supports the government focus on reducing the budget deficit.  However it believes that many services provided by local government are valuable and should not be a first priority for cuts.

We believe that the county should use the resources provided by government and those it raises locally to support the local population and the economy.  The Tories have diverted significant funds into reserves “for a rainy day”, and we have seen reserves grow dramatically during the financial crisis.  They appear to be saving for a “rainy decade” while cutting services NOW.  Funds could be used on today’s issues using reserves set aside for activities that will never occur.

The county must fund infrastructure that supports the local economy and ensure it is fit for purpose.  For broadband we can see some progress but highways maintenance is slow and inadequate.

The county should provide services that support a good quality of life for vulnerable people and those who have difficulty getting work.  We need to help people into work or help them into work re-enabling people who have had problems whenever possible.

ACS–Services for the elderly and vulnerable

Within ACS the administration continuously seeks to reduce demand making no increase for inflation or demographic change.  We support continuous pressure to improve efficiency removing bureaucracy and deploying new techniques and technology.  However, we must ensure that people are not just forced out of relative low cost services into those with much higher spend.  Into acute hospitals due to a lack of care places for instance.  The county should collect data on local needs, understand it and focus on those needs.  There should be clear evidence that needs are being met.

The cycle we see too often in our divisions, of a chaotic and disastrous end to life bounced from service to service must cease.  We find it difficult to believe that this can be achieved in the face of an increasing elderly population while we put money in reserves “for a rainy day”.  The problems experienced with care homes within the County’s contract are inexcusable.

The County must watch its strategy closely to be sure that the vulnerable are not being pushed out of the support system.  Cost reductions purely from lower wage rates or working hours are not acceptable.  They just move the budget problem to the benefit bill.

Public Health

Mental health services are clearly inadequate but at national level Liberal Democrats are taking action and we welcome the moves by Norman Lamb to establish maximum times for referral.  We believe that the County must play its role in this area.

CYP– Children’s services with emphasis on education.

CYP concerns us most.  The performance of many of our schools, particularly those in deprived areas lags the national picture.  While there are improvements, in key stage 2 reading, writing and maths Suffolk has improved moving us up the Local Authority rankings from 145 to 141 this is not good enough.  The Tory response is to cut the overall CYP budget by £6.6 million.

We have the “Raising the Bar” initiative but find it difficult to detect any real enthusiasm for it in Suffolk Schools or a belief that it is an effective approach.  A school governors commented recently “If the Local Authority continues to focus on such non-events as the distribution of meaningless and infantile rosettes, I think we can be confident that the Bar will remain firmly on, or near, the floor.”

Currently we appear to have a learning inspection service and we need a learning improvement service.

Leadership is essential but the enthusiastic effective leadership teams in our good and outstanding schools just don’t have the budget to cover supply replacements while they help others to make the leap in teaching and learning required.  They can’t neglect their own schools and let them fall back.

We still believe that the County should fund supply cover and in addition establish a small number of “excellence” teams who could work with the leadership teams in failing schools to remove pressure, determine what needs to be done and put it in place.   Excellence teams would need people with proven track records who enjoy a challenge and would need to ensure that necessary management decisions are taken.

The cost of such teams would not be trivial but would be small compared to the County budget and must be less than the continuing cost of failure.

The Conservative administration have been in control of our children’s education now for ten years and in many areas a whole generation of Suffolk young people have been through a failing education system.  This system must be improved and “Raising the Bar” is not working.

Bramford to Twinsted 400 kV line

National Grid has today announced that the proposed upgrade to the network between Bramford and Twinstead is now needed much later than originally planned following updated information from the electricity generating companies who are planning to build new power stations and off-shore wind turbines in the eastern region.

It is now envisaged that a connection will not be required until the early 2020s rather than 2017 as originally planned.  National Grid’s assessment confirms however that an upgrade will still be needed to connect new the sources of power but not at this time.  The project has therefore been placed on hold for the time being.

The company had been planning to undertaken further consultation on the project early next year before making an application to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.  This will now take place at a much later date.

National Grid has produced a report – the Bramford-Twinstead Need case 2013 – which explains the changes to the proposed power generation projects.  This will shortly be available at:  www.nationalgrid.com/bramford-twinstead

National Grid is proposing to hold a briefing session with County and District Councillors on 28 November and will be explaining the implications at the forthcoming Community Forums which are detailed below and at which you are welcome to attend.  Further information about the briefing will be circulated when the time and venue is confirmed.

 

Forum Venue Date Time
Hintlesham and Bramford Burstall village hall 28 November 2013 6:30pm – 8:30pm
Polstead Stoke by Nayland village hall 2 December 2013 6:30pm – 8:30pm
Hadleigh HadleighTown Hall 3 December 2013 6:30pm – 8:30pm
Twinstead and StourValley Wickham St Paul village hall 4 December 2013 6:30pm – 8:30pm

Cock Lane Bramford

This year I managed to get the County and District Councils to finally sort out the difficulties that were preventing the placing of a tarmac surface on the Cock Lane path to the back of Bramford Primary.  However I wondered if the time for this improvement had passed.  Yesterday I was very pleased to meet a large group of mums and children using the path.

Not a waste of money but a useful job well done.

Cock Lane

Park and Ride passengers plummet

We Lib Dems today revealed that the Park and Ride service has seen a huge fall in passenger numbers since the Bury Road site was closed at the beginning of 2011.

The County originally predicted that when they closed the Bury Road site around half of the passengers would transfer to either London Road or Martlesham. Prior to the closure at the beginning of 2011, a total of 1,000,000 passengers were using one of the three services every year. There were 300,000 passengers using the Bury Road site in the final year of its operation. The total number of passengers has now dropped to 500,000 per year.

In 2011, not only did the Conservatives close the Bury Road Park and Ride site, but they introduced a charge for over 60s, and made them wait until 9.30am before they could use their bus passesThe Ipswich Park and Ride service was introduced when we ran the council in coalition with Labour. It has always been highly valued, but the Conservatives seem determined to destroy it.

We fought a campaign to keep the Bury Road site open. We carried out a survey of passengers, organised a petition and made the Cabinet reconsider its decision. They would not change their minds and they failed to look at the full implications of the closure. This dramatic fall in passenger numbers has major implications for Ipswich. We have no way of measuring how many people now drive into Ipswich, or avoid it altogether. In this difficult economic climate, and with the advent of online shopping, town centres need all the help they can get.”

In detail, figures for the London Road and Martlesham Park and Ride sites are:

Total passengers 03 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 – 557,665

Total passengers 04 April 2010 to 02 April 2011 – 749,176

Total passengers 05 April 2009 to 03 April 2010 – 769,666

The figures also include those travelling on concessionary passes which gave free travel until 1 April 2011 & half price travel after this date.

Bury Road was still operational until January 2011. Its all tickets breakdown was:

For 2007/08   192,000

For 2008/09   245,000

For 2009/10   306,000

This meant that in the year 2009 – 2010, there were a total of 1,075,666 users of the Park and Ride service in Ipswich

The County Council Election

You will have all received a Focus leaflet covering my achievements over the past four years, the concerns I have about the Conservative administrations focus on externalising services and cutting services in a way that damages the economy and the things I would like to see done differently.  Pointing out the mistaken policies unfortunately sounds negative but can’t be avoided.  Suffolk deserves better.

The leaflets Conservative candidates are distributing explains quite clearly their need to take urgent action on education after 8 years in control and U-turns a on travel card and rural bus services.  The claimed investment in Care I can’t find in their last budget.  Is it another last minute move or something I just don’t recognise as investment?

At the moment most candidates will be  working hard to get round to as many people as possible meeting you face to face and answering your questions.  An important one is just why you should vote for me as a Liberal Democrat rather than the other candidates.

Part of the answer is my skill set and past record of achievement that I have put in the Focus leaflets but putting the why Liberal Democrat part very briefly:

Liberal Democrats are for a stronger economy and a fairer society

The Conservatives won’t deliver a fairer society; Labour can’t deliver a stronger economy; only the Liberal Democrats can deliver a stronger economy and a fairer society, enabling everyone to get on in life

We promise that across all County responsibilities we will deliver:

  • Sensible pragmatic policies based on your wishes
  • A constant focus on improved efficiency
  • A compassionate approach to a fairer society supporting your endeavours and ensuring people with disabilities are treated well
  • Help for young people to a good education then a good job

Our more detailed policy document is available on the pull down list above.  It aims to be brief so as not to demand too much of your time to read.

Of course the severe economic problems left behind by the last government mean that money is in short supply and services will only expand if we make savings elsewhere.  But that not unreasonable and it is always the case that we must continually drive up efficiency.  We must do that and deploy wisely the resources given to us by government and those we gain through business rates and council tax.

The question of Europe and our reaction to its present difficulties and the impact they have on the UK’s prosperity is really a matter for the Liberal Democrats in government.  However, I believe that we should understand that that vast numbers of UK jobs depend on Europe and  recognise that the UK is the English speaking gateway to Europe for companies from the USA, Japan, Korea, India etc.  If we leave Europe and they go taking many jobs with them.

The issue of the impact we are having on the world environment and the climate change that is underway has slipped from public view as we all struggle with austerity and the need to stay in work and feed and clothe ourselves and our families.  However it is still an important issue which we must not ignore until it is too late to take avoiding action and limit the adverse impacts.  We must do this in a pragmatic way gaining from the many actions we can take without seriously damaging our economy.

I hope you take this opportunity to question us all, consider the issues carefully and make a wise decision, not just make a protest that damages your livelihood.

John Field

Highways Procurement

You will recall that in previous Parish Reports I stated that the County Council had agreed a contract with Balfour Beatty to provide the highways services across Suffolk but that there had been a last minute problem.  The County Council has now provided an update.

 “In December 2012, Suffolk County Council announced Balfour Beatty Living Places as the Preferred Bidder for the contract to maintain and improve Suffolk’s highways from 1st April 2013.

Following a period of extensive and constructive discussion with Balfour Beatty Living Places, Suffolk County Council has not been able to confirm and clarify commitments made to the point where it can provisionally award the contract. It has therefore been decided that the procurement process will revert to the previous stage where Suffolk County Council can liaise with any, or all, of the bidders who submitted final tenders (including Balfour Beatty Living Places), before again identifying a preferred bidder.

This does not affect the county council’s ambition to identify a private sector company that will be responsible for the design and implementation of highway maintenance and improvement works, winter gritting, street lighting, traffic signals and bridge works throughout the county.

A key objective to achieve £2 million of recurring revenue savings in year 2013/14, helping the council’s transport department to achieve efficiency savings of 1.5% per year remains in place.”

Suffolk Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy

The Suffolk Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy is a requirement under the Health and Social Care Act 2012.  It has been produced by the new division of the council working with the National Health who up to now have been responsible for this activity.  It will focus on four strategic themes:

  1. Every child in Suffolk has the best start in life;
  2. Suffolk residents have access to a healthy environment and take responsibility for their own health and wellbeing;
  3. Older people in Suffolk have a good quality of life, and;
  4. People in Suffolk have the opportunity to improve their mental health and wellbeing.

The next stage will be an action plan

Report to Gipping Valley February 2013

Budgets: The County budget was passed on 14th Feb. 

The headline announcement was a promise to freeze council tax for four years.  In a time of austerity we don’t want demands on our income to rise but this looks like a pre-election give away.  Who will suffer and will other changes make it possible?

In summary, estimates of cost increases on a £511m net budget are Inflation £7.7m, Demand and Demography £12.4m and “other Changes” £21.3m lifting the total to £552.4m.  

Government grants and council taxes total £527.4m, so the county must save £24.9m of which £20.1m is “saving” of estimated increases.

Headline “savings” include: improve efficiency and remove unnecessary processes £9.7m, target resources in children’s services £2.5m, adult care in depth review £7m.

Obviously the efficiency improvements and removal of unnecessary processes are long overdue.  My biggest concerns are the care review and targeting in children’s services.  These can be disguised cuts that increase the problems suffered by vulnerable people.

I proposed a small addition to the budget to provide some focused immediate action to help schools improve pupil progress and attainment.  After eight years the administration has moved us from the top third to third from bottom in national league tables.  It was rejected and Suffolk children must wait for action.

GCSE rankings: Suffolk has now dropped to 141 out of 152 authorities for GCSE results.  The County Council claims that this is down to exams boards changing grade boundaries, but it simply isn’t good enough.  

It is extremely concerning how low Suffolk is ranked nationally for education, and this is something which clearly has not been addressed by the administration.

Road Safety: The first phase of improvements to road markings at the Pound Lane accident spot are now in place but the police are still resisting a reduction in the speed limit.   Improved centre markings and movement of the 50mph markers towards Bramford are yet to come. 

You will have seen work progressing on Bramford Road by the incinerator, as the road signs for the 40mph limit and the urban clearway are put in place.  This should give the police additional tools to control the lorry parking that is making life difficult.

Councillors Guy McGregor and Lisa Chambers who are responsible for highways and waste will meet with local businesses to try to find a cooperative solution to the problems that protects both our environment and jobs.

District Council: Councillors are still defining “priorities” for the future.  However, a balanced budget with a zero council tax rise will be possible that adds slightly to reserves.  There will be no new dramatic cuts but there are still redundancies to come as the transformation programme is completed.

This year there will be changes in council tax rebates and housing benefits, reductions for excess rooms and movement towards a single payment instead of a range of benefits. 

The effect of the caps involved in these will make finance even more challenging for many families.  The impact on local councils will not be trivial as small amounts of council tax will be difficult and expensive to collect.

Highways

The final agreement to outsource highways services to Balfour Beatty  in a £200m contract lasting five years was made at cabinet.   The company was to be responsible for the design and implementation of highways maintenance and improvement works, winter gritting, street lighting, traffic signals and bridge work throughout the county.  However they have pulled out at the last minute for reasons that are far from clear but which I believe relate to additional risk associated with the transfer of staff.
 
We had been assured that some £2 million would be saved per year and that the level of service would be maintained.  This must now be at risk although the County view is that they are essentially returning to an earlier stage in the negotiations and the overall projectr is not compromised.

It is important that whatever changes occur you continue to enjoy high standards of routine maintenance, a rapid response to problems and winter gritting that keeps the county moving. When councilors need to intervene we will still hope to get rapid action.

District Council Budget

The initial analysis by officers indicates that a balanced budget will be possible adding slightly to reserves without moving from the position defined during the current year.  Savings from redundancies already determined but not yet all implemented should be sufficient.

There are to be major changes this year in council tax rebates and housing benefits, reductions for excess rooms and teh Government are moving towards a single payment instead of a range of benefits.  The effect of the caps involved in these will remove some significant anomalies but also make finance even more challenging for many families.  The impact on local councils will not be trivial.  Small amounts of council tax will be difficult and expensive to collect from people without money, for instance.