We all agree that house building must match the growing population, and the government insist upon it. People are living longer, living on their own and emigrating to and within the UK to do vital jobs. However, new housing must be distributed in a way that does not destroy the Suffolk environment we all enjoy.
After much delay the new Mid Suffolk District Council Local Plan is at last nearing completion but just when will it be delivered? . It should have been produced much earlier to guide developers to locations that villages could tolerate.
The turmoil and chaos around national politics and the
Brexit disaster coupled with the need to focus on the District Council
elections have been a significant distraction this month. However, there is news from the County, a
mixture of good and bad to report.
Investment for Special Educational Needs
In February I reported that the cross-party Policy Development
Panel had recommended that the County invests £45.1m in SEND. This will develop new Special Educational
Needs & Disability schools and specialist units in Suffolk.
I am pleased to say that this plan is going to Cabinet during
April with a recommendation to proceed. Some
800 places in the county to provide pupils the support they need locally will
be a leap forward.
Less welcome is the news emerging from the cross party Policy
Development Panel on the Family Services.
Regrettably this panel appears to be pushed in the direction of
significant cuts. The proposals are
secret at the moment, and I can’t report how accurate the leaks in the press
are. However, this looks like an attack
on a successful service that has great value.
The “Reserved Matters ” for the Snoasis planning application were agreed Wednesday last week. That’s all the details that were not covered when the Secretary of State agreed the application after the public inquiry in 2007. In fact a number of items in the legal agreement, the “section 106” document were changed to planning conditions, a process the government likes as it usually reduces the delay between application and the start of work. However in this case the district council and the developer have taken 10+ years to ge to this point so I wonder just how speedily things will develop from now on. The problem with conditions is that they are agreed at officers discretion so local people have little input.
We were promised that the “Local Reference Group” rather like the Liaison Group that I chair at the Suez EFW plant. I hope that will help to keep residents and the parish group in touch and get the local voice heard.
My input to the meeting as Ward Member
Is this a
wonderful opportunity to gain a world class winter sport facility or just a chance
to spend further years being assured with little supporting evidence that “finance
is in place” while wilfully blind optimism drives a project that is just not
viable. If it were a good business project
would we now be 13 years down the road with little to show?
Just to warn those of you who visit relatives or friends in Baylham, the main way in to the village will be closed for seven weeks from Monday. The Care Centre is connecting its dysfunctional sewage system to the village drains by putting a pipe in a trench up the road.
They won’t use any of the shorter routes across the fields or round the field boundary. The contractor is using “traditional” methods, not fast trenching machines, so seven weeks not two. Thanks guys!
Highways of course just agreed-like in Barham, Claydon and at Hackneys Corner. Trying to get them to look after the residents is up hill all the way. The diversion routes are through Little Blakenham or along Circular Road (Back Street) from B1113. Both 4.3km with few passing places.
We are asking people to come in via Back Street and out via Little Blakenham but not all will do that, its not official, please be careful. Highways have promised to try to grit the road if it’s necessary. The Care Home is still accessible from the B1113
Question to Councillor Mary Evans from Councillor Field
I wonder if you could explain what effective actions are being taken to ensure that communities do not suffer endless disruption from utility and developer works that proceed at glacial pace or the even more problematic coincidences of several sets of work that gridlock a community. Continue reading Highways, January Council Meeting→
County Council Election tomorrow, don’t forget to vote it’s vital for democracy. I am the Liberal Democrat Candidate. I enjoy representing you and I hope you will vote for me. I have kept you informed through “In Touch” over the last four years letting you know what I have delivered, what the challenges are and what the County is trying to do. Do you feel I have worked hard enough for you to select me again? I hope so and look forward to a tough four years as the UK changes its position and influence in the world and the County makes its contribution.
For the next four years, My targets will be:
To continue to deliver on local issues and needs, tackling problems that impact directly on your life.
To organise a Gipping Valley effort to develop a plan for our highways that will allow the housing expansion necessary to meet local needs without creating road chaos.
To continue to insist Highways respond to your needs effectively and maintain out roads well.
To make sure public transport and park and ride schemes are not further damaged,
To ensure the County makes the maximum commitment it can afford to social care, reducing the impact on the NHS of unfulfilled need and using, not hoarding in reserves, the funds it has.
To help local groups support and construct new facilities in the area.
To remain deeply involved with improvements to the efficiency and effectiveness of County services.
Advocating investment where it will cut long-term costs, improving quality of life and reduce demand for services.
For several years it has concerned me, and many others I speak to, that trees, hedges and general dirt are being allowed to obscure road signs. A while ago I searched for any rules that may apply as directed by the Department For Transport and found the attached from the Traffic Signs Manual (1982 Amended 2004). I would bring your attention in particular to 1. Introductory, paragraph 1.2 and 5. The Design & Use of Signs, paragraph 1.31 (b) and 9. Maintenance of Signs. All common sense, you would think?
Quite obviously these conditions are not being met. For example: the road sign coming up to the Hadleigh Road mini roundabout at Sproughton from the Washbrook direction. It is so obscured by the hedge that you cannot read the sign until you’re virtually next to it and nearly at the roundabout!! Similarly, now the leaves are coming out on trees, other signs are disappearing behind them. I cannot believe that this problem is not the subject of more of an outcry as with the pot hole debacle. Being unable to read road signs from a safe distance is as dangerous as having to be more vigilant in avoiding potholes.
Suffolk Highways needs to meet its obligations under these rules which are made for good reason. I think you will have seen from my leaflets and “In Touch” contributions that I have been active in pressing for improved performance across the board although the key focus has been potholes .
I believe that the outsourcing of the highways contract has not worked and, despite the Conservatives rolling it on for another five years, it must either perform in short order or the work must be taken back in-house. Suffolk people just can’t continue to put up with the issues you raise or the potholes.
We must have the management talent to guide the workforce to high performance. As the government has been giving some relatively small but significant grants for such work and we could use a sensible amount, £2 million, from the £150 million reserves to make one-off improvements. We should be able to do better!
You will get this if you ensure there is a strong opposition after Thursday to make sure that the mantra that everything must be privatised does not result in self-deception about the level of performance achieved.
The plans to expand Claydon Primary to 2.5 form intake to cope with children from Blakenham Fields are almost ready to discuss with local residents.
The main resident concern will I am sure be parking and safety at the school entrance. Busy parents or carers need to drop children off on their way to work, so they dont have time to walk to school despite the benefits the exercise brings.
If we could find money to resurface the car park at the recreation ground it would be more attractive. The footway to the school would make it a safe option but the cost would be high. We must get an estimate to see how big the task would be.
Unfortunately there is no space for a drop off point, a drive through school, where children could be handed to staff!
Lots of people to talk to in Acton Road today, detailed views to soak up and tasks to do. Potholes were the main complaint. How is that they are repaired but fail in days or at best a few weeks? Highways claim they are doing far more repairs as planed work with much less reactive temporary fixes but people are not seeing an improvement.
It is amazing how County Highways can take so long to fix the potholes in places like Bacon Road, the approach to Claydon Primary School and Chapel Lane. The road surfaces need replacement but remain in a sorry state. Other roads are re-surfaced when they appear quite OK.
If there was an explanation (not an excuse) that we could see we might understand
Gipping Valley News from John Field