Suffolk County Council submitted a response to the deeply disappointing Sizewell Stage 4 consultation, as did Woodbridge’s Town Council. These are my concerns, written specifically as Woodbridge County Councillor – and as LibDem Green and Independent group county councillor representing a division affected by the development
First and foremost I deplore that the consultation does little to answer – or even ameliorate – concerns that were raised by the many respondents to the stage 3 consultation. It is as if the concerns and suggestions of the people of Suffolk did not exist.
Secondly, I would query why we are still even considering building Sizewell C? It is intended that Suffolk will be supplying about 30% of the UK’s electricity – but only about 7% of UK electricity will come from Sizewell C, the rest will be offshore. Suffolk contains 1.4% of the UK’s population. The impact of the building – let alone the running – of Sizewell C will have a 100% impact on the people of Suffolk coastal. This impact is largely negative.
We are told that the benefits of Sizewell C will bring £100m annually to Suffolk. But the tourist benefit of the Suffolk Coastal AONB and coastal heaths, and of the natural environment of countryside around is £240m annually– on all of which Sizewell C will have an adverse impact via a range of issues such as loss of coastal paths, unsympathetic design, the 10-12 year impact of building works, and all the additional traffic. This does not make economic sense.
Thirdly, the financial case for nuclear power no longer adds up. EDF will be overcharging UK consumers for electricity from Sizewell for the next 35 years: prices of offshore wind-generated power, per KWhr, without any subsidy, are less than half what EDF is being guaranteed. Continue reading Why I cannot support Sizewell C